Private digital intelligence bureau Lawful OSINT — Cyber monitoring — Due diligence
Internet Intelligence Service Private digital intelligence

Topic pathway

Due diligence and reputation decisions

Verify entities and roles, interpret public allegations and reviews, and define decision conditions.

Which unresolved claim could change the decision?

First action

Identify the exact entity and transaction, then rank the material claims to test. Use stable identifiers before linking people, proceedings or companies.

Useful output

A documented identity check, contextual risk findings, missing documents and explicit conditions for proceeding or deferring.

Interpretation limit

An allegation is not a ruling; a shared address is not ownership; a negative review is not automatically manipulation. Retain dates, outcomes and plausible alternative explanations.

Select the guide matching the question

Check sanctions listsGuide · identity and current sourcesDue diligence checklistDecision guide · 11 minVerify a company and its directorsDue diligence guide · 13 minVerify an online identityOSINT guide · 9 minAssess a surge of online reviewsReputation guide · 13 minAssess an online rumour or narrativeInfluence guide · 12 minVerify an online fundraising appealVerification guide · 12 min

Keep the decision traceable

Record the fact being checked, the material reviewed, what remains unknown, the person responsible and the next review trigger. A result is useful when another reader can understand why an action was chosen and what would change it.

2025 threat observatory20 indicators · CSV + JSONOSINT source-reliability matrix32 source types · filter + CSVDigital intelligence glossary63 terms · filter + CSVDigital verification matrix36 checks · filter + CSVDigital incident triage28 scenarios · filter + CSV

Consult primary source portals

Match the situation to a check and a usable output

SituationCheckRecord to keep
Partner existenceConnect trading name and legal identifier in the relevant register.Exact entity, documents and dates; existence separate from solvency.
Director or representativeVerify published role and authority for the transaction.Role source and mandate confirmation.
Public allegationFind origin, updates and the entity’s response.Facts separate from accusations; namesakes excluded.
Sanctions candidateCompare identifiers and current lists for relevant regimes.Candidate, list, date, contradictions and compliance referral if unresolved.

When to pause and escalate

Rank unknowns that could change the decision. A material contradiction warrants a targeted request. Repeated articles with a shared origin cannot compensate for a missing decisive document.

Prepare a source and decision log →

FAQ

Is a registered company a safe partner?

Registration establishes administrative information. It validates neither the offer, payment nor correspondent’s authority.

How should a useful conclusion be written?

Describe established facts, hypotheses, unknowns and pre-decision conditions. Date the note and specify what triggers another review.

Further reading

Editorial resources on other sites